15th May 2024

The unreliable relationship between Insulin, Proinsulin, and C-Peptide in Preterm Neonates.

Jamie Egan


In assessing C-peptide readings in preterm neonates and adults, it is important to recognize that these two populations are inherently different. Comparing C-peptide levels between them can be inaccurate. This is primarily because of the unpredictable clearance of C-peptide in preterm neonates and the need for multiple samples to get reliable results.

The clearance of C-peptide in preterm neonates can be highly unpredictable because of their immature renal function. The kidneys play a vital role in filtering and eliminating substances from the body, including C-peptide. Preterm neonates may have an underdeveloped renal function, which can cause faster clearance rates. This can cause very variable C-peptide levels compared to adults, even in the absence of any underlying medical condition.

Another important consideration is the sample size required to get reliable C-peptide readings in preterm neonates. Because of the variations in clearance rates and potential fluctuations in C-peptide levels, multiple samples are often necessary to get an accurate assessment. This can be challenging with preterm neonates, as obtaining blood samples from them can be more difficult and carry additional diagnostic risks. Therefore, relying on a single C-peptide reading in a preterm neonate may not provide an accurate representation of their insulin production or metabolic status.

In conclusion, comparing C-peptide readings in preterm neonates with those in adults is not accurate because of the unpredictable clearance of C-peptide in preterm neonates and the need for multiple samples to get reliable results. The unique physiology of preterm neonates, including their developing organ systems and immature renal function, contribute to significant differences in C-peptide levels compared with adults. It is essential to consider these factors when interpreting C-peptide readings in preterm neonates and avoid making direct comparisons with adult populations.

It is even more critical when using these measurements as forensic evidence.